Objectify Wall Street

Recently, actress Ashley Judd was quoted lamenting “the objectification of girls and women and this hypersexualization of our society that invites” criticism of women’s looks. This after People magazine said that the 43 year old actress looked “puffy” during recent publicity rounds to promote a new movie.

The “sexual objectification of women”, viewing them merely through the lens of sexuallity….now there is some good 60′s feminist rhetoric for you. Problem is, no one knows what the hell you are talking about when you use terms like that. And I have proof of this.

For the last few years, I have offered the following comment for shock value: the older I get, the more I find myself objectifying women. My comment has been met with “huh?” and bovine stares. No one gets my twist on 1960′s feminist rhetoric without explanation.

Being someone who rides a bicycle 22 miles most days in a constant battle with my own midsection, I recently also tried “I need a woman like my bicycle needs a fish”. No luck there either.

When faced with a particularly uninformed opinion offered by a woman, I have been known to mumble “they never should have given women the vote”. Now that does get a reaction, and may explain why I have yet to hold elected office.

Black people complain about the “racial divide”, but it is not nearly as problematic as the “facial divide”. In separating the cute females from the uncute, and being largely a face-man, I find it useful to think in terms of a “facial divide”. The facial divide is what separates an attractive women from someone not-so-hot, but it is also chasm that Ashley Judd is now crossing as she transitions from cute-as-a-button to once-cute (e.g. Lauren Bacall). However, classifying women based on face alone leaves most of the female body unobjectified, and so my theory of the “facial divide” will not be a useful tool for most men.

Like Marxists, feminists are good at identifying a problem, while often offering silly solutions. Men objectify because our genes are what they are. Female behavior can be explained the same way. You might be able to change the behavior, but the underlying instinct will still be there.

H.L. Mencken, whose wit you will often see quoted in my writings, once remarked that a misogynist is a man who hates women as much as other women hate each other.  Put no obstacles in the way of any women’s (or man’s) career path, treat everybody fairly, be able to laugh about the rest and then the rest will take care of itself. Do this, and you will never be accused of objectification, let along be asked to spell it.

Houston, we have a clusterhug

How many times have you heard it said that Armageddon would have followed had the banks or the auto companies been allowed to go bankrupt? But how do they know that would have been the case?

They answer is that they don’t know, and they are probably wrong. Companies go bankrupt all the time, and they are either liquidated (e.g. Circuit City) or restructured (e.g. American Airlines), all this without government intervention. If the purpose of the government intervention had been to break up the companies and make sure that nothing like this happened again, it may have been OK. But that is not what happened. Not even the shareholders were brought to zero, which is a must in any bailout. Charles Bagehot, the father of the “Economist” magazine, knew this already 15 years ago.

Nothing has been done to avoid bailouts in the future because big business wants heavy government involvement. Government is a tool for making you pay for their losses, it can be used to make trouble for your competitors, both foreign and domestic, and it can be used to create additional barriers to entry into a business segment you want to protect.

Once we had real “one person, one vote”, politicians quickly figured out that they could buy the silence of voters through “services” and handouts. Politicians and big business quickly figured out that they could buy each other off using your money, and soon formed an alliance against the interests of the common man.

Note 18th century writer David Hume said “truth springs from argument amongst friends”. Today, powerful interests want no dialogue, they want “team players”. Government buys the silence of legions of “business people” that I would never call business people on account of their penchant for government grants. Part of being an adult is being self-sufficient, not needing to breastfed all the time just to survive.

H.L. Mencken said “the plain fact is that education is itself a form of propaganda – a deliberate scheme to outfit the pupil, not with the capacity to weigh ideas, but with a simple appetite for gulping ideas ready-made. The aim is to make ‘good’ citizens, which is to say, docile and uninquisitive citizens.”

Today, we are being “educated” to think that the banks must be propped up all the time, directly and indirectly costing the taxpayer their money and their children’s future. I have a better idea: prosecution and long prison terms.

If we want good outcomes, we have to put a stop to this gov/biz clusterhug, where you cannot see where one entity begins and the other ends.